It's Not About Steak Sauce After All!
There's I remember about 8 years ago hearing rumblings about this mysterious
project Stanley Kubrick was working on, called AI. At this point, Full Metal Jacket was the last film he had produced, and that was in 1987, so Kubrick fans were chomping
at the bit for him to bring out another masterpiece, and a science fiction one at that. I waited and waited, and apparently Kubrick didn't feel he, or the current state
of special effects, were ready to make AI the right way, so he gave us Eyes Wide Shut instead, and died shortly before post production was through, seemingly leaving AI
dead in the water.
I left Eyes Wide Shut with a bad taste in my mouth. Aside from some nice nude shots of Nicole Kidman, and a hypnotic sex party scene, the film didn't seem to be a fitting
end to Kubrick's career. Frankly, the film pretty much sucked, with the real life romance and turmoils of Cruise and Kidman's relationship clouding anything the film had
When word came out that Steven Spielberg was going to take AI over, I was skeptic to say the least. Certainly he gave us tremendous films like Jaws, Close Encounters, and
Schindler's List, but to stack popcorn munching fare like ET and Jurassic Park against 2001 A Space Odyssey and The Shining seemed like a joke. Was he going to dumb it
up? Was he going to sacrifice deep intelligent filmmaking for robots and car chases? The odds were certainly stacked against him.
And so apparently were the initial reviews. I thought it was a bad sign when the newspaper ad was topped with a quote of praise from Rex "I'll rave about any film
just to keep my name out there" Reed. Moriarty from Aintitcoolnews.com ripped it to shreds and called it a let-down, and even Roger Ebert, the critic I respect the
most, seemed mildly disappointed with it. Hell, even Matt told me some of his friends walked out on it an hour into it, so I feared the worst.
But faced with a schedule that made me choose between The Fast and The Furious, and AI, I had to give it a shot. I'm glad I did.
I always like stories where we struggle with what humanity really is. From Mary Shelly's Frankenstein, where man reanimates the dead to create life, to various series of
Star Trek where Data and the holographic Doctor evolve as machines, but never quite get there. If you make a machine that looks like a human, talks and moves like a
human, even fucks like a human, as in the case of AI, is it human? What defines life? The missing element, explored in this film, is LOVE. While Moulin Rouge celebrates
how "all you need is love" in a heavy handed and campy way, AI curses its main character, a boy robot named David (brilliantly played by Haley Joel Osmet from
The Sixth Sense), with the ability to love.
A couple, who's son's been in a coma for years, is given David to "field test" and see if they like him. The mother, who's a wreck and has been mourning her
son's coma for ever, activates the commands that imprints love for her in David's circuits, bonding him to her for all eternity. It's a dream come true, until the
realities of the situation turn it into a nightmare.
David can't understand that she'll die someday, and he'll be forced to live forever. And when her "real" son recovers and comes back home, he's relegated to
being "a toy". As her affections wane, his only grow stronger. David just wants to be held and loved by his mom. Imagine if you got sick of your Furby but you
couldn't turn him off and he followed you around everywhere.
Unfortunately, once activated to "love", the programmers can't remove the emotion, and his mother knows that he'll be destroyed if she takes him back to the
manufacturer, so she abandons him in the forest, like the father in Hansel and Gretel, to fend for himself. It's one of the most heart wrenching and sad scenes I've seen,
as he clings to her screaming as she flings him aside and drives off into the night.
At this point, he begins a fairy tale quest, inspired by the Pinnocchio story he was read, to find The Blue Fairy, in hopes he can be made into a real boy, so his mom
will love him back.
That's the central question of this movie. If you can teach a machine to love, can you actually love it back? Is a mother showing love for a robot son any different than
Tom Hanks bonding with a volleyball in Cast Away?
AI is a masterpiece. You've got beautiful eye candy that puts Bladerunner to shame, and performances from Jude Law (the robot Gigolo Joe) that are impressive beyond
belief. Not to mention "Teddy", a walking talking stuffed bear that is unbelievably cool looking. (And with this technology, a live action Winnie The Pooh film
would kick major ass). And though the signature Spielberg touches are there throughout, the spirit of Kubrick has affected everything. John Williams' soundtrack is
made more classical and haunting than his usual scores. Even the somewhat sad and cryptic ending leaves you asking questions as the credits roll, much like we saw in 2001
A Space Odyssey.
Spielberg was fortunate enough to actually meet with Kubrick and discuss AI in detail before he died. Perhaps that may prove to be AI's undoing with so many, though, as
the film is too smart for the average American moviegoer. The same audience that Spielberg helped to create, ultimately are the folks that will hate this movie.
People want happy endings with sharks blowing up that are easy to figure out.
Spielberg has solidified himself as the greatest American filmmaker with AI. It's sad to see his comrade George Lucas sinking deeper and deeper into Star Wars toy
commercial oblivion, while he continues to grow.
Let's hope it doesn't take the death of another great director to encourage Steven to try something like this again.