|
10,000 BC REVIEW

10,000 BC opens
with a voiceover introduction to a small mountain tribe who are
apparently waiting for the blue-eyed one to come (possibly an early
Frank Sinatra cult ). What the narrator fails to either mention or
explain is that this small group of people who, given their remote
location, would have a fairly high inbreeding rate, somehow manage
to appear multi-ethnic. They’re like a stone age Benetton
commercial - The United Colors of Mammoth Hunters - advertising this
season’s furs and sandals.
This is a land
where children, too puny-looking to be living a rough life,
congratulate each other with high elbows and talk to their wannabe
girlfriends with strangely accented lines read from Hallmarks
cards. For seasons or years, these people wait for the cloned CGI
wooly mammoths to arrive, so that they might run alongside them,
Pamplona-style, in what makes for better tourist snapshots than
hunting efficacy. Indeed, the lead bull is only killed because of
the greatest onscreen accidental victory since a young Anakin
destroyed the droid control ship.
But this is more
about spectacle than plot and the story itself is simple, despite
mixing Apocalypto, Pathfinder (both versions), The Warriors, The
Lion and the Mouse (Aesop’s Fables), The Last Starfighter,
Emmerich’s own Stargate (perhaps he had leftover sets and
costumes?), and every movie in which somebody was ever told they
couldn’t walk across a desert.
But wait, you
say, weren’t they just in the mountains? Yes, they were, but this
is a movie in which characters either casually manage to walk a
thousand miles, or they somehow experience faster climate change
than an Al Gore nightmare. And along the way they meet many other
tribes who apparently have much more insular breeding standards.
All of these
folks have two things in common: They’ve been visited by the same
slavers and they seem to believe in conveniently coordinated
prophesies. It’s as if they were all told, independently, that
12,008 years later, Roland Emmerich would make a movie that tied all
of their unique tribal stories together in a previously unlikely
manner. And how incompetent do you have to be in the slave
gathering business, to need your supervisor to remind you upon
arrival in a village “Don’t kill, capture them!”? Oh, right, sorry
about that first one boss. My bad.
But you can’t
allow these details to matter, unless you find them funny, which
certainly helps. You can’t ponder the fact that a long lost father
happened to wander off in the only direction that would serve the
screenplay. You can’t dwell on a circle-drawing leadership analogy
that seems like an introduction to set theory and Venn diagrams.
You can’t allow yourself to lament the awkward movements of a sabre-toothed
tiger or the physics of spear throwing. You can’t laugh too loudly
when the high priest first sees “the mark”. And you can’t afford to
wonder why people wouldn’t separate their seeds and beans into
separate bags.
For, if you do
any of these things, you would miss the spectacle of watching “he
who speaks to the speartooth” (for reals!) chasing after “she who
has Sinatra’s eyes” across a continent’s worth of cinematically
diverse habitats and neighborhoods. This is a Summer popcorn movie
that was relegated to March and, as such, it’s not really good
enough to love or bad enough to hate. Perhaps the best approach
would be to match the movie with cheese flavored corn.
-Tony Sheppard
tony@retrocrush.com |